Home

|  Table of Contents

|         Court Forms  | Law Journals  |  Law Students | Law Dictionary  | News

     

eUSLAW.US

  BankruptcyCode.US
     

  California

  United States Law.US
     

Supreme And Appellate Court

  US Government
     

Opinions

  US Tax Center
 US Codes | State Codes Federal Civil Procedure

| FederalCriminalProcedure

|   War on Terror

| Lawyers
                                                 


A Legal and Business Portal

 

 

   
   
Social Security |  Finance   Hotels

US History

Restaurants

 Entertainment

World Directory

                                                     
 


California Superior Courts 
Local Court Rules  
My eLawOffice
University Law School     
California Criminal law
Legal News
First Amendment
Fourth Amendment
Fifth Amendment
Sixth Amendment

 


California Supreme And Appellate Court
Opinions

 

 

LII: Law about...Federal Courts
 

 

       

Law Students

 


 

Filed 5/22/06

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

 

COPY

 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin)

----

 

 

 

Estate of ANDREW J. ROSSI, SR., Deceased.

 

 

ANDREW J. ROSSI, JR.,

 

          Petitioner and Respondent,

 

     v.

 

TOINETTE ROSSI,

 

          Objector and Appellant.

 

C049330

 

(Super. Ct. No. PR75314)

 

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

 

 

THE COURT:

     It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on April 27, 2006, be modified as follows:

     On page 20, the last sentence of the first full paragraph which begins “Subdivision (c) merely clarifies that a codicil or amendment . . . “ is DELETED and REPLACED with the following language:  “Subdivision (c) merely clarifies that a testator or settlor with a post-200l will or trust that already contains a no contest clause that meets subdivision (a)’s specificity requirements need not repeat the no contest clause in a codicil or amendment in order to have the no contest clause apply to the will or trust.” 

     Andrew J. Rossi, Jr.’s petition for rehearing is denied.  This modification does not constitute a change in the judgment.

 

BY THE COURT:

 

 

 

     BLEASE              , Acting P.J.

 

 

 

     MORRISON            , J.

 

 

 

     CANTIL              , J.

 

       

mmmm
         
 Law Students

  

  


Thomas - Legislative Information on the Internet |Check Your Credit Score | UN Treaty Reference Guide
Directory of Medical Dictionaries |
California Injury (Torts) Law | Yaazoo! | Shopping
USA Entertainment.US | FederalCriminalProcedure.Com | United Statea News |
Travel |
FederalCriminalProcedure.Com | iLaw Dictionary.Com |
Library of Congress |
United States Law Consumer Law  | USA Entertainment.US |
starUnited States News
iBusiness Center.US | United States Law: Constitutional Law: Constitutions of  The World

California Contracts Law.Com | California Injury (Torts) Law | Advanced Trial Handbook
Phone Directories From Around the World New | California Law Revision Commission | Federal Courts
California Civil Procedure.Com | Advanced Trial Handbook-Ervin A. Gonzalez, Esq.
Yaazoo! | Abogados Latinos | United States History | Spanish | Federal Courts | Federal Rules of Evidence


Copyright 2003 by  © - USAConstitutionalLaw.Com™©  All Rights Reserved